I support this proposal (though, am currently traveling and don’t have the means to vote in support of it on-chain).
Maintaining an active set of deployments across as many networks as possible, while actively growing users, is clearly in the protocol’s interest.
While a more targeted (per chain vote) approach would be better, these packages are on the “low end” size-wise, and I could see them as a baseline with per chain votes in the future for augmenting the packages.