Thanks @eek637 for bringing up this topic. We are happy to hear that the initiative has shown good success. And if you explore the delegate list, there are actually quite many developers or contributors with significant voting power that haven’t been voting for an extended time. For example, nkennethk with 5 million UNI who’s last onchain vote was in end of 2022 https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/delegate/0xa2bf1b0a7e079767b4701b5a1d9d5700eb42d1d1
Or Other Internet who hasn’t voted since August of 2023. https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/delegate/0xe093f6f2fc8e9a64285f4ed795b75e6fd28649f8
Therefore, it would be crucial to also ensure that even if such developers or contributors receive voting power, there should be accountability measures to ensure activeness (the same for current allocated ones)
I think it would be also important to think about how much voting power should be allocated for as well. Especially if we have to account that some previous delegates that used to participate might end up less active (which unfortunately has been the case)