# Treasury Delegation Round 2 Ideas - Developer Allocation **URL:** \ **Category:** Governance-Meta\ **Created:** [October 4, 2024, 4:52pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/treasury-delegation-round-2-ideas-developer-allocation/24678 "2024-10-04T16:52:26Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 1
**Author:** ![eek637](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/eek637/32/7037_2.png) [@eek637](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/eek637)\ **Post date:** [October 4, 2024, 4:52pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/treasury-delegation-round-2-ideas-developer-allocation/24678/1 "2024-10-04T16:52:26Z")
There’s some support for setting aside some UNI for a new category of underrepresented delegates, specifically people and firms that are actively developing products on top of Uniswap or in the Uniswap ecosystem. Qualifications for this category should likely be different from more traditional delegates, as they have not generally been involved in the governance process to this point. Some initial questions to get the conversation going: - what should baseline qualifications be to be considered? - what process changes would be necessary? (e.g. should we have a separate election?) - how much UNI should we allocate? --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/treasury-delegation-round-2-ideas-developer-allocation/24678)._