It is fortunate that this proposal did not pass. A few changes should be made to governance and delegate responsibilities:
-
A code of conduct should be established for delegates in the delegate program. This will help reduce conflicts of interest and ensure adherence to the votes cast during temperature checks.
-
@Doo_StableLab abstained during the temperature check and should have also abstained during the on-chain vote, as this proposal directly benefits @Doo_StableLab .
-
Quorum needs to be raised. This vote was much too close for not following due process, and the number of abstentions rather than outright rejections is concerning.
-
An open call for service provider proposals. i.e. payment proposals related to providing data for the success of the L2 incentive program.
-
Rules should be established to prevent service providers from applying for committee positions. Uniswap DAO is already facing conflict of interest issues in this regard.
Service provider voted against at temp check:
Service Provider voted for onchain:
