# Tané Delegate Platform **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegation Pitch\ **Created:** [June 27, 2024, 1:56am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164 "2024-06-27T01:56:37Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 2
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [November 29, 2024, 5:52pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/21 "2024-11-29T17:52:18Z")
### [Supporting Tally’s Development and Enhancements for Uniswap DAO Governance](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/74) (Onchain) Summary: Tally is requesting a grant of $250,000 annually for two years from the Uniswap DAO to continue supporting and enhancing the DAO’s on-chain governance infrastructure, aiming to improve governance capabilities and provide a better experience for the community. Vote: **FOR** Rationale: While there are a few concerns from us and the other delegates, we maintain the support made at the Snapshot phase and expect the Tally team to address them along the way. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [December 11, 2024, 11:38am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/22 "2024-12-11T11:38:21Z")
### [[TEMP CHECK] Uniswap DAO Principles](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xcc5e92fac9d5d9c68bb4f2f742e9e6760c75f7c13a44a02aba33c769505fd2c2) (Snapshot) Summary: The proposal introduces a set of guiding principles for Uniswap DAO delegates to formalize shared guidelines and enhance governance. These principles cover processual aspects (scope, adherence to governance processes, on-chain focus), conduct-related guidelines (disclosure of conflicts, security considerations, clarity, good faith actions, due diligence, and public feedback), and structural principles (maintaining decentralization, representing UNI token holders while considering all stakeholders, and accountability). The aim is to promote transparency, trust, and effective decision-making within the Uniswap DAO. Vote: **FOR** Rationale: We believe that rules enhancing the transparency and public nature of the Uniswap DAO, and making DAO governance by delegates fairer, are important for the DAO. We agree with these principles, which can improve the health of the Uniswap DAO by garnering support from more delegates. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [December 28, 2024, 5:28am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/23 "2024-12-28T05:28:51Z")
### [[Temp Check] - Adopt The SEAL Safe Harbor Agreement](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xba36ded3039fc2588cdc7352e2ac6dd40ca0c3548576d9d31256663fbfc3f1b4) (Snapshot) Summary: This proposal seeks to adopt the SEAL Whitehat Safe Harbor Agreement, allowing Uniswap to benefit from rapid whitehat intervention during active exploits and ensuring recovered funds are returned promptly while whitehats receive predefined bounties under clear legal protection. Vote: **FOR** Rationale: We support this proposal because it is critical for strengthening Uniswap’s security and provides the necessary budget and guidelines to achieve that goal. By protecting whitehat hackers and offering them proper incentives, we believe this approach will safeguard Uniswap’s customer assets. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [December 28, 2024, 5:44am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/25 "2024-12-28T05:44:43Z")
### [[TEMP CHECK] Metal L2: Bridging TradFi and DeFi Through Uniswap V3](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x1b31cc6ab6b8ceb3ea3ada7684d08debc20d8a3b29fd94363223892264ab937d) (Snapshot) Summary: This proposal aimed to bring Uniswap V3 onto Metal L2—an Optimism-based Layer 2 focused on integrating traditional finance with DeFi—by requesting $250k in UNI incentives and offering MTL tokens to bootstrap liquidity, but was ultimately rejected due to concerns over the requested UNI allocation and the relatively early stage of the Metal L2 ecosystem. Vote: **AGAINST** Rationale: We oppose this proposal. Compared to other chains that have received incentives in the past, Metal’s TVL is still small, and we feel that granting 250k in incentives is not appropriate. While it is indeed important for Uniswap to build market share across various chains, we believe incentives should align with each chain’s growth stage. From that perspective, Metal has not yet reached a point where allocating 250k in incentives to gain market share is justified, and thus we have voted against this proposal. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [December 28, 2024, 5:46am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/26 "2024-12-28T05:46:17Z")
### [[TEMP CHECK] Scale Uniswap Liquidity on Celo](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xb7218cdbaab203872d4f17d161d84ad04f8b35ab6d8254d6786ca18d9893fe40) (Snapshot) Summary: Stabila Foundation proposes allocating $250k in UNI incentives over six months to bolster liquidity for seven key stablecoin pools on Celo, alongside $105k for Oku deployment and maintenance, while matching these incentives with $500k in Celo. This collaboration aims to expand Uniswap’s presence in emerging markets, strengthen stablecoin liquidity, and support Celo’s transition to an Ethereum L2 in Q1 2025. Vote: **FOR** Rationale: We support this proposal. Considering Celo’s TVL and its track record of collaboration with Uniswap, a $250k incentive alongside a $105k deployment cost appears to be a reasonable budget. Additionally, matching incentives from Celo itself is a welcome move. We look forward to seeing this proposal drive greater Uniswap share and activity on the Celo network. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [December 28, 2024, 5:54am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/27 "2024-12-28T05:54:35Z")
### [Discretionary Budget from UAC for Co-Incentive Campaigns](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x90fab9ab51bb8ca09bab7d76e7ccacaf7dad184e697c870c30957770211cc95d) (Snapshot) Summary: The proposal authorizes the Uniswap Allocation Committee to quickly use surplus funds for co-incentive campaigns—like a $250k matching program with EtherFi—without undergoing lengthy governance processes, thereby ensuring the protocol can seize high-impact, time-sensitive opportunities. Vote: **FOR** Rationale: We have voted in favor of this proposal, as we believe it enhances Uniswap DAO’s capital efficiency and ensures we do not miss opportunities to grow the DAO’s market share. We also look forward to the continued activities of the Uniswap Growth Program. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [December 28, 2024, 5:55am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/28 "2024-12-28T05:55:37Z")
### [Incentive Package for Sonic (Formerly Fantom)](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x5527b3846cd05a64346a00461d2c763531f43e2b2f4f1c7d55e1ba7de60c4d4e) (Snapshot) Summary: Uniswap is deploying on Sonic (formerly Fantom), an EVM-compatible L1 with 10,000 TPS and sub-second finality. Sonic Labs will provide $500k in $S tokens as incentives, and this proposal asks the Uniswap DAO to match $250k in $UNI to boost liquidity mining rewards and promote adoption on the Sonic chain. Vote: **FOR** Rationale: We support this proposal because Sonic demonstrates significant growth potential and offers a dynamic environment suitable for a $250k incentive. Furthermore, its robust infrastructure, high throughput, and continued developer-focused efforts position Sonic as an emerging ecosystem where Uniswap can expand its market share. With these points in mind, we cast our vote in favor of this proposal. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [January 8, 2025, 1:16pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/29 "2025-01-08T13:16:09Z")
### [Scale Uniswap Liquidity on Celo](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/77) (Onchain) Summary: This proposal from the Stabila Foundation requests $250k in UNI incentives over six months on Celo, plus $105k to deploy and maintain Oku’s advanced Uniswap v3 trading and analytics platform. Stabila will match these incentives with $500k in CELO, amplifying the impact and deepening stablecoin liquidity. Vote: **For** Rationale: Same as [its Snapshot vote](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/26), we believe the amount requested seems reasonable considering the TVL and the expected growth of the Celo ecosystem. ### [Incentive Package for Sonic](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/76) (Onchain) Summary: This proposal requests allocating $250k in UNI tokens to match Sonic’s $500k incentive program, creating a combined $750k in liquidity mining rewards for Uniswap on Sonic. Vote: **For** Rationale: We keep supporting this proposal for the same reasons as [its Snapshot vote](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/28), and we are looking to see the growth driven by this combined incentive program. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [January 17, 2025, 4:29am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/30 "2025-01-17T04:29:35Z")
### [Governance Proposal - Adopt The SEAL Safe Harbor Agreement](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/79) (Onchain) Summary: This proposal suggests adopting the SEAL Whitehat Safe Harbor Agreement, enabling whitehats to intervene during exploits to protect Uniswap’s assets. It establishes clear guidelines, legal protection, and incentives, enhancing security and emergency response while maintaining transparency. Vote: **For** Rationale: As stated for [the previous snapshot vote](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/23), we believe this proposal is essential for enhancing Uniswap’s security and ensuring effective responses during critical situations. ### [Uniswap DAO Principles](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/78) (Onchain) Summary: The proposal outlines principles for the Uniswap DAO governance, focusing on transparency, security, and accountability. This on-chain vote aims to confirm these principles, ensuring broad support and adherence to governance processes. Vote: **For** Rationale: We have already supported this proposal in [the snapshot vote](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/22) and did the same in this onchain vote. We believe that clarifying various rules like these will make the Uniswap DAO more transparent and open. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [February 24, 2025, 11:19am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/31 "2025-02-24T11:19:38Z")
### [[Temp Check] Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 3](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x0c7b3acc56ad1d276cd4c9338e2ef8ca9e15e8ab3e3a22d395fd34398bda40af) (Snapshot) Summary: This proposes a new round of delegate rewards under Uniswap governance, focusing on more objective, onchain-based metrics for delegate selection. It builds on previous cycles’ success and shortcomings to improve overall governance engagement and keep voting quorums consistently met. Vote: **Yes** Rationale: We support the updated criteria, as the updates such as the new tie-breaker mechanism demonstrates clear improvements. Over the long term, we also believe that the timely submission of rationales and forum participation should be integrated into the delegate selection scoring, even though objectively measuring the quality of discussion contributions remains challenging. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [March 4, 2025, 4:19am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/32 "2025-03-04T04:19:13Z")
### [[Temp Check] Uniswap Unleashed](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x424f821d0378b7152e02cbcfedf12c1c3aa2af5fe50b0476cdadfc4269892b4b) (Snapshot) Summary: In this proposal, the Uniswap Foundation aims to allocate $95.4M to grants and $25.1M to operations for Uniswap’s next two years of development, emphasizing hook adoption and governance enhancements. A separate proposal is seeking $45M to fund liquidity incentives, distinct from these budgets. Vote: **Yes** Rationale: We support the proposal as Uniswap v4 is a key innovation in DeFi, and significant investment in hook development and user onboarding is critical at this stage. Regarding Unichain, we believe using UNI token staking to recover investment is feasible. Treasury sustainability is critical for both the DAO and UNI holders. Despite the large expenditure, the investment is manageable given Uniswap’s market position. We acknowledge concerns about UF’s transparency and future grant allocations but believe they can be addressed moving forward. This proposal is essential for strengthening Uniswap’s position and increasing UNI token value, so we support it. ### [Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 3](https://vote.uniswapfoundation.org/proposals/80) (Onchain) Summary: This proposes a new round of delegate rewards under Uniswap governance, focusing on more objective, onchain-based metrics for delegate selection. This is the onchain vote following [the snapshot vote](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x0c7b3acc56ad1d276cd4c9338e2ef8ca9e15e8ab3e3a22d395fd34398bda40af). Vote: **FOR** Rationale: We continue to uphold [our snapshot vote perspective](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/31). Our view remains unchanged, as the updated criteria, including the new tie-breaker mechanism and the integration of timely rationale submissions as part of the delegate requirements, clearly demonstrate improvements. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [March 6, 2025, 5:59am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/33 "2025-03-06T05:59:01Z")
### [[Temp Check] Unichain and Uniswap v4 Liquidity Incentives](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xe7fb39bd6f16b65d0847cdd6ab6ecef3a6c1e89bd523cf895f3d806c4bb4b1cf) (Snapshot) Summary: The proposal aims to fund liquidity incentive programs to foster initial liquidity and growth for Uniswap v4 and Unichain. It seeks to provide liquidity rewards and encourage developers and LPs to engage with both platforms, ultimately enhancing the Uniswap ecosystem. Vote: **For** Rationale: We have no major issues with the selection process, given Gauntlet’s track record and Aera’s qualifications. While concerns about the sustainability of the incentive’s impact exist, focusing on failures isn’t productive. That said, we call for more transparency in the future selection process. We support the overall approach of the incentive program, but emphasize the need for ongoing monitoring. Gauntlet’s focus on high-volume core pairs seems valid. We agree to proceed but suggest adapting if necessary and reviewing progress regularly. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [March 17, 2025, 1:20am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/34 "2025-03-17T01:20:21Z")
### [[Temp Check] Saga Uniswap v3 Liquidity Incentives](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x6175261050aeccdd3d541cb4eb2b58c9fde747bfda509896586df5a62e1295d4) (Snapshot) Summary: This proposal requests $250k worth of UNI incentives for six months to bootstrap liquidity on Uniswap v3 pools deployed on Saga, a Layer 1 designed for horizontal scalability via chainlets. Vote: **Against** Rationale: We recognize Saga’s unique approach and acknowledge its potential to become a meaningful market for Uniswap in the future. However, at this point, we haven’t yet seen sufficient traction or growth metrics that justify a $250k investment. We’d prefer a more conditional incentive program, possibly tied directly to measurable TVL growth, or alternatively, revisiting this discussion once initial growth and performance become clearer and easier to evaluate. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [March 19, 2025, 4:05am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/35 "2025-03-19T04:05:22Z")
### [Uniswap Unleashed](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/83) (Onchain) Summary: This proposes allocating $95.4M to grants and $25.1M for operational costs over two years to expand Uniswap Protocol’s ecosystem, governance capabilities, and to support the launches of Uniswap v4 and Unichain. Vote: **For** Rationale: Our position remains largely unchanged from [the Temp Check](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/31#p-56120-temp-check-uniswap-unleashedhttpssnapshotboxsuniswapgovernanceethproposal0x424f821d0378b7152e02cbcfedf12c1c3aa2af5fe50b0476cdadfc4269892b4b-snapshot-1). We support this proposal because Uniswap v4 represents critical innovation in DeFi, and substantial investment in hook development and user onboarding remains essential. Although we recognize ongoing concerns about UF’s transparency and future grant management, we continue to see these as addressable challenges. ### [Unichain and Uniswap v4 Liquidity Incentives](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/82) (Onchain) Summary: The Uniswap Foundation, in collaboration with Gauntlet, proposes liquidity incentives for Uniswap v4 and Unichain to swiftly migrate liquidity, driving user adoption and positioning both as critical digital infrastructure. Vote: **For** Rationale: We continue to support this proposal, consistent with [our Snapshot vote](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/32#p-56157-temp-check-unichain-and-uniswap-v4-liquidity-incentiveshttpssnapshotboxsuniswapgovernanceethproposal0xe7fb39bd6f16b65d0847cdd6ab6ecef3a6c1e89bd523cf895f3d806c4bb4b1cf-snapshot-1), recognizing these liquidity incentive programs as necessary expenditures to secure the competitive growth of Uniswap v4 and Unichain in the current highly competitive environment. This ultimately leads to maximizing long-term value for UNI token holders. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [March 31, 2025, 9:09am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/36 "2025-03-31T09:09:30Z")
### [[Temp Check] Treasury Delegation Round 2](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x04af1fcb7538cf5458c5c17baa50fe410952d48e98d451a6ca5f7b94fea87ee8) (Snapshot) Summary: To ensure continued governance health and retain active delegates, we proposed Treasury Delegation Round 2, distributing up to 18M UNI. This plan establishes an 18-month delegation term with on-chain expiry and selects delegates using DIP Cycle 3 scoring and a voting power cap. Vote: **Abstain** Rationale: We proposed this initiative because we recognize the importance of evolving the Treasury Delegation program for the DAO’s health. To remain neutral as the author of the proposal, we are voting to abstain on this proposal as stated in [the proposal’s discloure section](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-treasury-delegation-round-2/25355#p-56193-disclosure-23). ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [April 17, 2025, 3:11pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/37 "2025-04-17T15:11:24Z")
### [[TEMP CHECK] Establish Uniswap v4 Licensing Process](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xfbaf8a48bc110a815e6b8cfaaf6c73451cb0c6e5e3d48e10e72893bf95911740) (Snapshot) Summary: The proposal is to establish a licensing process for Uniswap v4 by creating subdomains to manage BSL exemptions and track deployments, aiming to accelerate its adoption across multiple chains. This proposes granting the Uniswap Foundation a blanket license exemption for v4 deployments and allowing the UAC to manage the official deployment registry. Vote: **For** Rationale: Rapid multi-chain deployment is crucial for accelerating the adoption of v4. This approach of establishing a clear licensing process is well-suited for effectively leveraging external partners in the expansion of Uniswap v4. ### [[TEMP CHECK] BoB Uniswap v3 Incentives Package](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xad0e29aa7bc8e783c15b959b92b02b871af879b8f36372e80fc5ff5fc189ed8f) (Snapshot) Summary: This proposal requests a Uniswap Onboarding Package for the BOB Network, a Hybrid Layer 2 combining Bitcoin security with EVM smart contracts, aiming to establish Uniswap as the primary DEX on BOB. This includes a request for $375k worth of UNI in incentives and rebates to match BOB’s commitment of $500k over six months to grow liquidity on Uniswap v3. Vote: **For $375k** Rationale: Considering BOB’s already significant presence as the 3rd largest by TVL in the Superchain and 5th among Uniswap deployments, combined with the anticipated long-term growth of Bitcoin and its DeFi ecosystem (BTCfi), the requested contribution appears to be a reasonable investment. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [April 22, 2025, 5:48am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/38 "2025-04-22T05:48:11Z")
### [BoB Uniswap v3 Incentives Package](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/84) (Onchain) Summary: This proposal requests a $375k UNI onboarding package for BOB Network, a Hybrid Layer 2 combining Bitcoin security and EVM compatibility, to match BOB’s $500k commitment for incentivizing Uniswap V3 pools over six months. The goal is to establish Uniswap as the canonical DEX on BOB and unlock Bitcoin liquidity for DeFi. Vote: **For** Rationale: We continue to support this proposal consistent with [the Snapshot vote](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/37), believing that BOB has significant importance after it being the 3rd largest by TVL in the Superchain and 5th among Uniswap deployments. This shows a great potential for Uniswap to grow, and the amount requested is reasonable considering BOB’s $500k commitment. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [April 29, 2025, 8:31am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/39 "2025-04-29T08:31:01Z")
### [UAC Renewal S4](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x629995d68efbfea149bbd4fdc35cfcacca9bd327e3cbf1382fd6753df583e890) (Snapshot) Summary: The proposal is for the continuation of the UAC through Season 4, involving a $370,000 budget increase to accommodate extended monthly hours from 30 to 40 hours, ensuring smooth operations and stable multisig management. Vote: **For** Rationale: This proposal effectively extends UAC’s operations and appropriately expands its capacity to manage growing DAO responsibilities. The requested budget is justified by the detailed accounting of their expanded workload and essential multisig security responsibilities. No substantial operational changes are introduced, thus maintaining continuity and stability in DAO functions. ### [Approved Budgets Rebalancing (S4)](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xaf7a6894af35b3a71cd7222d4a17ef2ef85ff8ffb3f02be8c7e6e9dec548f9bf) (Snapshot) Summary: This proposal requests a rebalance of $280,142 in UNI to adjust program budgets affected by UNI token price fluctuations, ensuring ongoing DAO commitments are fully funded. Vote: **For** Rationale: This proposal represents a straightforward rebalance of previously approved budgets. It does not introduce new spending beyond existing commitments, nor does it involve substantial changes to the original allocations. Thus, there are no significant concerns or issues with this adjustment. ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [May 1, 2025, 2:03am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/40 "2025-05-01T02:03:21Z")
### [Establish Uniswap v4 Licensing Process](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/85) (Onchain) Summary: This proposal sets up two ENS subdomains for BSL exemptions and v4 deployment tracking. It gives the Uniswap Foundation a global license exemption and the Accountability Committee authority over registry updates. Vote: **For** Rationale: This proposal provides a structured process for multi-chain v4 deployments, accelerating rollout and adoption. We supported it at [the snapshot stage](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/36#p-56573-temp-check-establish-uniswap-v4-licensing-processhttpssnapshotboxsuniswapgovernanceethproposal0xfbaf8a48bc110a815e6b8cfaaf6c73451cb0c6e5e3d48e10e72893bf95911740-snapshot-1) and remain in favor for the on-chain vote because this approach is an effective practice for driving v4 adoption across multiple chains. ### [[Temp Check/Revised] Treasury Delegation Round 2](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x46fef087a43555e156db287d370151a76e19e1e2cd7d36f442409987f93d4215) (Snapshot) Summary: We, Tané, propose allocating up to 15M UNI in temporary treasury delegations, selecting qualified delegates through objective criteria, and implementing a 12-month expiration alongside quarterly evaluations to ensure sustained governance participation. Vote: **Abstain** Rationale: This proposal is designed as a temporary measure necessary to maintain efficient DAO decision-making, incorporating several adjustments based on feedback from various delegates. To remain neutral as the author of the proposal, we are voting to abstain on this proposal as stated in [the proposal’s discloure section](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-treasury-delegation-round-2/25355#p-56193-disclosure-24). ---
**Author:** ![Tane](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/tane/32/8797_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tane)\ **Post date:** [May 9, 2025, 5:08am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/41 "2025-05-09T05:08:13Z")
### [[TEMP CHECK] Scaling V4 and Supporting Unichain](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x58f16ed9e140551bb80d265ea9b958e96c542a7d7afc081610f72506a4f7cb05) (Snapshot) Summary: This proposal seeks $250K for full-stack development of V4 functionality in Oku and $90K for Unichain infrastructure maintenance, totaling $340K. The V4 portion involves a two-month delivery scope for analytics, UI, and trade tools, while the Unichain portion ensures continued support at a discounted rate. Vote: **For** Rationale: This proposal supports a team that has consistently contributed to Uniswap’s multichain growth and delivers practical infrastructure. The $340K request appears reasonable given the scope, particularly for the V4 integration, which requires new development distinct from previous V3 work. Early and proactive support for V4 infrastructure is both necessary and strategically important to ensure smooth adoption across ecosystems. ### [[Temp Check] Analytics Hub for Uniswap’s Revitalization and Growth Program](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x675c9697cc6c8d1cab27e1cffab3fdc7740b3e978eb37d8b6dcce76d1726670f) (Snapshot) Summary: This proposal requests $60k in UNI for StableLab’s Forse to analyze four additional chains under the Uniswap Revitalization and Growth Program, integrating results into the existing incentives terminal. Delivery by the end of Q2 2025 will supply ROI, retention, and efficiency metrics to guide future incentive allocations. Vote: **For** Rationale: This proposal gives us a unified lens to compare incentive campaigns across chains and pools with identical metrics, letting us judge which designs truly sustain TVL, volume, and user retention. Side-by-side benchmarking will cut iteration time; it turns scattered reports into actionable evidence that guides smarter sizing and timing of future incentives. While further work is required to connect these insights to future liquidity-allocation strategies, we view this analysis as an essential step toward a full feedback loop and therefore support the requested funding. ### [Four Chains for Analytics Hub for Uniswap’s Revitalization and Growth Program](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xd0e154ab11dfeed1fb652c4a4db011937ffa7dd3333847936c09a668b5e5e804) (Snapshot) Summary: The proposal asks Uniswap voters to pick four chains for the Forse Analytics Hub to study, contingent on the main $60 k Analytics Hub proposal passing. Vote for: - Mantle - ZKsync - Sei - Polygon zkEVM Rationale: We selected the four chains mainly based on the current TVL and the team’s experience of ecosystem growth, while also considering other factors. This is because chains with those profiles tend to obtain deeper liquidity and larger user bases at some point, and thus should be prioritised in this case. ### [Approved Budgets Rebalancing (S4)](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/86) (Onchain) Summary: This proposal rebalances nine previously approved Uniswap DAO program budgets by topping them up with $280,142 worth of UNI to offset token price losses. It ensures each account, ranging from Incentive Packages to Delegate Compensation, remains fully funded for Season 4 obligations. Vote: **For** Rationale: This tops up the affected wallets with $280,142 in UNI, introduces no new spending, and makes no material changes to the original allocations. We supported it at [the snapshot](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/39#p-56757-approved-budgets-rebalancing-s4httpssnapshotboxsuniswapgovernanceethproposal0xaf7a6894af35b3a71cd7222d4a17ef2ef85ff8ffb3f02be8c7e6e9dec548f9bf-snapshot-2) stage for precisely these reasons and continue to do so, as the adjustment poses no significant concerns and simply preserves existing commitments. ### [UAC Renewal S4](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/87) (Onchain) Summary: This proposal renews the Uniswap Accountability Committee for Season 4 with a $320,000 operating budget and a $50,000 discretionary fund, totaling $370,000 through December 2025. It keeps a five-member structure, raises capacity to 40 hours per month and continues staggered elections to replace two members while preserving project continuity. Vote: **For** Rationale: This proposal has had our support since [the Snapshot](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164/38#p-56757-uac-renewal-s4httpssnapshotboxsuniswapgovernanceethproposal0x629995d68efbfea149bbd4fdc35cfcacca9bd327e3cbf1382fd6753df583e890-snapshot-1); we keep supporting it because extending the UAC keeps core DAO work running smoothly. Raising the commitment to 10 hours a week and funding $370 k in UNI fairly matches the larger workload and removes the need for extra funding votes. Stable funding and clear roles protect the DAO’s day-to-day reliability. [Previous page](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164.md?page=1) [Next page](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/tane-delegate-platform/24164.md?page=3)