# \[RFC - Update\] Deploy Uniswap v3 (1 / 0.3 / 0.05 / 0.01) on BNB Chain (Binance)

**URL:** <https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-update-deploy-uniswap-v3-1-0-3-0-05-0-01-on-bnb-chain-binance/19734>\
**Category:** Requests for Comment\
**Created:** [December 11, 2022, 7:04am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-update-deploy-uniswap-v3-1-0-3-0-05-0-01-on-bnb-chain-binance/19734 "2022-12-11T07:04:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 75

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jessewldn](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/jessewldn/32/1324_2.png) [@jessewldn](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/jessewldn)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2023, 5:33am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-update-deploy-uniswap-v3-1-0-3-0-05-0-01-on-bnb-chain-binance/19734/75 "2023-01-31T05:33:32Z")

</div>

Hey all, cross-posting a few thoughts [from Twitter](https://twitter.com/jessewldn/status/1620186024403152896).

1/ great to see the snapshot driving attention/clarity on bridging’s role in cross-chain protocol deployments

2/ I’m abstaining from the vote as I don’t think the list of options on offer is comprehensive or deeply researched

3/ zooming out, my view is that its suboptimal for communities to be voting on singular bridge choices, effectively king-making solutions.

protocol design needs to adapt for a multi-chain world, to reap the benefits of competition through standardization, not voting.

4/ closing thought: glad the convo is moving forward , and hope this proposal will kick off more efforts to dig deeper into bridge research and protocol design to enable multiple choices.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-update-deploy-uniswap-v3-1-0-3-0-05-0-01-on-bnb-chain-binance/19734)._