Thanks for the post @Doo_StableLab and we’re happy to see these discussions starting to happen!
I’m a little confused by the proposed setup: Is anyone who holds a badge and has over 80% voting and communication considered “eligible”? Then the monthly budget gets evenly split across all eligible members?
If so, I think some Sybil or spam scenarios might occur where badge holders nominate many small wallets and take up more “eligible” spots than “deserved,” especially since the requirements are rather lean and don’t take much effort to “game”. Some sort of token weighted structure such as the quadratic method Maker used in your image might be more appropriate in my opinion, and/or implementing a true “cutoff” (albeit lower UNI such as 250k or 100k).