To Abdullah’s comments on outstanding structure mentioned on today’s call:
If the intent is to increase votable supply and reward qualified delegates, why put a cap on seats and a set delegation amount per seat vs choose the votable supply increase desired and then establish a threshold set of metrics? All delegates who meet the criteria equally share the VP to be allocated? Eg anyone with over X points qualifies, no tie breakers
Net effect: desired votes increase is achieved and maximal qualified delegates are added?
Current approach trades off maximally including qualified delegates / contributors just to arbitrarily set a per seat delegation amount. And from a dollar value perspective the delegation per seat is actually quite high leaving room to reasonably spread it a bit wider.
Alternatively to respect the tier structure tier 1 could be capped seats for the power delegates, tier 2 could be open ended.