[RFC] Proposal to active 2, 3, 4 bps fee-tiers on Base

  1. I agree that fee-weighted volume (or just fees in general) is likely a better metric than pure volume. This should be the KPI for this proposal.
  2. This specific problem may be a short-term, but ultimately I believe this proposal is aimed at giving more flexibility to LPs. This is why I am against giving token incentives to these new pools.

On your comment about the tick-spacings, I was going to stick with the 2x fee-tier that has traditionally been done. While I agree with you that smaller tick-spacings could make sense on cheaper chains, there is little hard empirical evidence of the tradeoffs of tick-spacings. I have no strong opinion however and would take feedback here.

1 Like