[RFC] Principles for Uniswap DAO

[SEEDGov]

Thank you very much for your detailed feedback and we respect the discrepancies you raise, which sound very reasonable!

@kfx

Delegates should inform the community if they consider that a proposal is superficial, light, unclear or unsubstantiated and needs to be improved or deepened before it is submitted to a vote.

• Don’t disagree! This could be named something like “Public Feedback” and added to the list.

We agree with your suggestion.

@kfx

Delegates must not become cartelised and must protect the protocol from other delegates who make proposals only for personal gain but which do not serve the protocol.

• I feel this is already somewhat covered by the “Decentralization” and “Disclosure” principles - maybe you can propose changes in those instead of introducing a new one?

Although it could be understood that it is covered in the two points you mention, we understand that it would be appropriate to include it explicitly as this is a very malicious and misaligned behaviour. It could be included in the “Decentralization” point, we have no objection to that.