# \[RFC\] Metal L2: Bridging TradFi and DeFi Through Uniswap V3

**URL:** <https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-metal-l2-bridging-tradfi-and-defi-through-uniswap-v3/24981>\
**Category:** Requests for Comment\
**Created:** [December 6, 2024, 4:58pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-metal-l2-bridging-tradfi-and-defi-through-uniswap-v3/24981 "2024-12-06T16:58:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SEEDGov](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/seedgov/32/8912_2.png) [@SEEDGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/SEEDGov)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2024, 1:35pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-metal-l2-bridging-tradfi-and-defi-through-uniswap-v3/24981/7 "2024-12-19T13:35:29Z")

</div>

We have voted against of this proposal, you can read our rationale in [our delegation thread](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/seedgov-delegate-platform/23987/26):

> [@SEEDGov Delegate Platform](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/seedgov-delegate-platform/23987/26):
>
> [In accordance with our criteria and in line with our past votes](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/seedgov-delegate-platform/23987/4), we have voted against this proposal. While we see promising potential in the Metal L2 network and the expansion of Uniswap into this regulated ecosystem that aims to bridge TradFi with DeFi, the reality is that the network currently shows very low activity and LTV, so we do not believe it is productive to allocate incentives at this time. If the network shows signs of maturity and traction in the future, we are open to considering the allocation of incentives.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-metal-l2-bridging-tradfi-and-defi-through-uniswap-v3/24981)._