# \[RFC\] Deploy Uniswap v3 on Zora **URL:** \ **Category:** Requests for Comment\ **Created:** [January 26, 2024, 5:12pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-deploy-uniswap-v3-on-zora/22724 "2024-01-26T17:12:06Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 7
**Author:** ![she256](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/she256/32/7488_2.png) [@she256](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/she256)\ **Post date:** [February 8, 2024, 6:40pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-deploy-uniswap-v3-on-zora/22724/7 "2024-02-08T18:40:39Z")
Thanks everyone for the great feedback. On the point of the commemorative mint split, here’s some further context and an update. Using the [Arb Zorb](https://zora.co/collect/arb:0x9a6735518847e59b71530512941afdf014a8a74b/1?referrer=0x33f6EE932cEa603Fafd6854827259bE172C91Da4) as reference, Zora is estimating ~50k mints totaling ~22.22 ETH for the commemorative NFT. Per the proposal, 70% of these funds would go to Uniswap DAO and 30% to Zora. Given these estimates, the Timelock contract seems less suited to being the recipient address for the split. This is especially because of the voting / coordination efforts needed to actively direct the funds. With the Arb Zorb, the Arbitrum Foundation had directed their portion of rewards to the charitable 501(c)3 nonprofit [Accelerate Art](https://x.com/accelerateart/status/1754894093384057327?s=20). Logistically, we therefore share the belief that it makes most sense for the DAO to direct these funds to an organization like [Protocol Guild](https://protocol-guild.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html) for core development. We will soon post the updated proposal onchain to reflect the details of the Zora Splits mechanism, and add Protocol Guild as the split recipient address. --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-deploy-uniswap-v3-on-zora/22724)._