Thanks for this proposal, and for your patience with the process. I think it’s important to make a distinction between your proposal and some of the others currently posted which seek to incentivize liquidity provision. Many of the teams that have written those proposals (Arrakis, Gamma, Angle, xToken, etc) have solutions working in production to which the DAO could send ARB that would be spent deterministically based on the parameters decided by delegates in the forum.
Because this proposal is requesting ARB to subsidize a private company’s operating budget, it is less deterministic and requires more oversight as it relates to accountability. That isn’t a bad thing! Funding teams building new products is an absolutely valid use of the Arbitrum airdrop. But to ensure that the funds are being spent as promised, it’d probably be best if such a grant were administered by a grant program such as the one described here or the UF as described here. This type of group can help to define scopes of work and deliverables, and to tie funding to development and product milestones in a way that just isn’t possible if every payment needs to be tied to a governance vote that gets 40m YES votes.