Thanks for this @alphagrowth, as well as @PGov and @AranaDigital - Personally I’d be in favour of adding structure to Uniswap’s incentive efforts in line with your arguments. Makes sense to have a dedicated team overseeing these efforts to ensure valuable opportunities are secured and effectively distributed.
I think the people you’ve listed as potential committee members are probably all well-suited for this, though I would still prefer an election in the spirit of decentralisation (as should be standard practice for the DAO imo), and in general not so keen on having people occupy seats across multiple DAO committees.
Some questions to consider:
- How will you measure and report the success of these incentive efforts to the community?
- Have you thought about putting any checks in place to ensure transparency and prevent conflicts of interest?
- How are you thinking about the structure and criteria around the partnership vetting process?
Thanks!