# \[RFC\] - Alastor | w3s - Create a UNI-ARB Working Group

**URL:** <https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-alastor-w3s-create-a-uni-arb-working-group/21376>\
**Category:** Requests for Comment\
**Created:** [June 3, 2023, 10:28pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-alastor-w3s-create-a-uni-arb-working-group/21376 "2023-06-03T22:28:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![0xkeyrock.eth](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/0xkeyrock.eth/32/8991_2.png) [@0xkeyrock.eth](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/0xkeyrock.eth)\
**Post date:** [June 15, 2023, 9:58am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-alastor-w3s-create-a-uni-arb-working-group/21376/7 "2023-06-15T09:58:43Z")

</div>

Great detailed proposal. On a high level, we’re supportive of this and it has the potential to fuel even more growth for Uniswap on Arbitrum.

Our only question mark is focused on the ecosystem fund and if it is necessary to be 25% of total airdrop when considering all the other proposals made.

For example, we’re in favour of [Gauntlet’s proposal](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-gauntlet-dynamic-incentive-optimization-for-uniswap-v3-on-arbitrum/21426/5) given their track record and extremely detailed/quantitative approach which is 2M ARB and then we’d like to support this proposal which asks for 2.2M ARB.

This leaves us 200k ARB left if that would be the community consensus. In that scenario we’d also support the [Flashstake proposal](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-flashstake-enabling-upfront-yield-for-uniswap-liquidity-v2-v3/21410) that is asking for 200k ARB.

In our view this seems like a good allocation and diversification of initiatives but we would like to openly question the community regarding the ecosystem fund and if it is maybe too much?

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-alastor-w3s-create-a-uni-arb-working-group/21376)._