Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] Scaling V4 and Supporting Unichain
Vote: Abstain
Rationale: We abstained from GFX Labs’ proposal. As we mentioned in the forum thread, the $250K request would ideally fall within the existing UF grants mandate. It’s more sustainable for the protocol’s funding pipeline to avoid duplicating costs, and if the UF decided that this initiative doesn’t align with their priorities, we’d rather not dip back into DAO treasury funds for an out-of-band request.
Proposal: [Temp Check] Analytics Hub for Uniswap’s Revitalization and Growth Program
Vote: For
Rationale: We voted FOR the Forse Analytics Hub proposal. While the budget is a bit high, we think it’s valuable to assess other chains that went through the incentive program before revisiting Unichain assessment.
Proposal: Four Chains for Analytics Hub for Uniswap’s Revitalization and Growth Program
Vote: We voted for ZKsync, Polygon zkEVM, Linea, and Unichain
Rationale: We’re basing our vote on growth potential, Ethereum alignment, technical maturity, and ecosystem alignment. Our top choices with that in mind are 1) ZKsync, 2) Polygon zkEVM, 3) Linea, 4) Unichain.