# \[Proposal\] Excluded Proxy Contract Airdrop — Phase 1

**URL:** <https://gov.uniswap.org/t/proposal-excluded-proxy-contract-airdrop-phase-1/5811>\
**Category:** Requests for Comment\
**Created:** [September 25, 2020, 1:08am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/proposal-excluded-proxy-contract-airdrop-phase-1/5811 "2020-09-25T01:08:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 83

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lauracroft123](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/f05b48/32.png) [@lauracroft123](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/lauracroft123)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2020, 2:07am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/proposal-excluded-proxy-contract-airdrop-phase-1/5811/83 "2020-10-06T02:07:59Z")

</div>

This is from their application post on the original thread. They link a blog post that shows them using Uniswap. I mean personally, I don’t care to nitpick that much. I say if it meets the criteria outlined by Nadav’s original post it’s good enough for me.

As mentioned, I feel rewarding as many users as possible is good for Uniswap, not bad.

[https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/19?u=lauracroft123](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/19)

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/proposal-excluded-proxy-contract-airdrop-phase-1/5811)._