# \[POLL\] How Would We Structure a Fee Reward?

**URL:** <https://gov.uniswap.org/t/poll-how-would-we-structure-a-fee-reward/5790>\
**Category:** Requests for Comment\
**Created:** [September 24, 2020, 8:04pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/poll-how-would-we-structure-a-fee-reward/5790 "2020-09-24T20:04:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 93

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Danpi314](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ee7513/32.png) [@Danpi314](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Danpi314)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2021, 12:33pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/poll-how-would-we-structure-a-fee-reward/5790/93 "2021-01-04T12:33:09Z")

</div>

Very interesting discussion, the option to switch on the fee should be available from mid march according to the 180 day time lock.

After reading through all these messages, I see the reasons not to buy and burn but to instead distribute X to all those that stake in the UNI voting contract for the following reasons;

- Incentivises staking in the voting mechanism rather than just passive holding (As only those that register to vote get the benefits from fee distribution, encouraging more to vote)

- Creates a situation where there is a P/E price of the token. (Based on $5 Uni, 400M volume and 100M tokens voting that’s about 6.8)

- Similar to point 1, encourages user not to store there Uni on centralised exchanges. (As they’d be missing out on these rewards, reducing that attack vector)

Buy & burn, doesn’t properly achieve any of these goals.

The question then becomes what token should be  
distributed?

I see 5 reasonable choices in my opinion.  
ETH, DAI, UNI, (ETH/UNI) LP, (DAI/UNI) LP

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/poll-how-would-we-structure-a-fee-reward/5790)._