# PGov Delegate Platform
**URL:** https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271
**Category:** Delegation Pitch
**Created:** [November 8, 2023, 3:10am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271 "2023-11-08T03:10:55Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 2
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [May 13, 2024, 3:42pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/21 "2024-05-13T15:42:07Z")
[[Temp Check] Onboard Uniswap to Redstone](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x35ed89cbda5bd11e333202c62d89fa223eab651adeb5e2cf6640d22411cc0946)
We voted **Deploy without incentives** : We are in favor of this deployment as with most and think that deployng without incentives for the time being is the best course of action being that the chain just launched and there is minimal traction.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [May 24, 2024, 1:41am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/22 "2024-05-24T01:41:03Z")
[DeFi Education Fund](https://app.uniswap.org/vote/2/63)
We voted **For** : Similar to our reasoning prior, we are in favor of this proposal and the specified funding for the DEF.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [May 28, 2024, 4:42am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/23 "2024-05-28T04:42:36Z")
[Uniswap Delegate Reward- 3 Months Cycle 1](https://app.uniswap.org/vote/2/64)
We voted **For** : Similar to our prior reasoning, we’re excited to see something get started and off the ground for delegates and will revisit in a couple of months.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [June 17, 2024, 9:56am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/24 "2024-06-17T09:56:06Z")
[Arbitrum LTIPP Incentive Matching](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x5210348973c8b035bf6003b5f5bb6375d382bb3230f8c9c578fb668d8573a585)
We voted: **$1m to $250k in order, Do Not Fund last** : Given the potential future collaborations with Arbitrum who has shown the ability and interest in funding projects, this is a great way to further increase our synergies. Uniswap is the top trusted and most active DEX on Arbitrum and there are a lot of advantages to us working together closer in the future.
We voted **For** : We voted for the on chain vote with the $750k option that won the snapshot, in line with our snapshot reasoning.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [July 22, 2024, 6:40pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/25 "2024-07-22T18:40:21Z")
[[Temp Check] Uniswap Onboarding Package - Gnosis Chain](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/onboarding-package-for-gnosis-chain/24166)
We voted **$250k** : Gnosis has shown a relatively decent level of product market fit and we think there could be substantial improvements in TVL and activity on Uniswap with these incentives there. $250k is in line with DAO soft consensus and past rewards for similar chains.
[Onboarding Package for Gnosis Chain](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/66)
We voted **For** : We voted for the on chain vote, in line with our snapshot reasoning.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [August 1, 2024, 9:42am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/26 "2024-08-01T09:42:27Z")
[[TEMP CHECK] Uniswap Onboarding Package - OKX Chain](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x4d070edcd39b24b67e219f8f0f6308083c28d510ed0a1ac4ed3fb8d5879f3b6b)
Edit: We voted **Abstain** : After chatting with the OKX Chain team, they have decided to postpone this vote for incentives until they launch their liquidity mining incentives initiative, when they might be able to provide matching incentives.
[[TEMP CHECK]- Revised - Uniswap Onboarding Package - OKX Chain
](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x6ded62e81a99ac1c6e9539aa79f5c15d0abaf6d41ae9f862d3e43d0b95139cda)
We voted **For** : In this revised vote, we think the DAO covering the cost of the OKU deployment is appropriate and we are in favor.
[Deploy Uniswap v3 on X Layer](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/67)
We voted **For** : We voted for the on chain vote, in line with our snapshot reasoning.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [August 9, 2024, 3:04pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/27 "2024-08-09T15:04:23Z")
[[Temp Check] Forse Analytics for Uniswap Revitalization and Growth Program](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xdf2d95ccfadebf141847b90e058f8fafb4f76d8ca2ec2a7351d93353187df560)
We voted **Arbitrum, Base** : This proposal by StableLab is well timed and for a very reasonable price, will help determine the effectiveness of the Incentives so far allocated to those chains. These two chains are the top priority in our eyes and no matter the third, these two should definitely be considered.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [August 14, 2024, 4:11pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/28 "2024-08-14T16:11:54Z")
[[Temp Check] Activate 2, 3, 4 bps fee tiers on Uniswap v3 on Base](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xcd74f6280e53cbdb3bda8349c3c6b833e613faf4677278e85a38cb06e5afb355)
We vote **Yes, activate additional tiers** : We see no major issues with doing this and will allow Uniswap to be more competitive on Base, hopefully taking some market share back from aerodrome.
Edit: We have voted similarly in the revised version of this vote.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [August 20, 2024, 6:39pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/30 "2024-08-20T18:39:30Z")
[[Temp Check] Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 2](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xff05f8e61540a8ad3ca98b9a65a4b135d7834bdb0cf286a1346dcd6fcda85df0)
We vote **Yes** : Following the conclusion of the first cycle of delegate rewards, the increased participation from the candidates combined with more consistent communication was a great addition and something definitely worth revisiting.
[Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 2](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/68)
We vote **For** : We voted for the on chain vote, in line with our snapshot reasoning.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [September 6, 2024, 5:41pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/31 "2024-09-06T17:41:35Z")
[[Temp Check] - Ethereum Foundation Attackathon Sponsorship](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x51ab2ced6ddc652531d0a4f719aa43b62beba11b5d97773750e682b6e8aed5a0)
We voted **Do Not Sponsor** : This was a bit tricky but our ultimate decision came down to the seemingly lack or strong support in the forums and a hard time figuring out the direct benefit to Uniswap. We’ve seen this proposal around in other DAOs and it seems like some have sponsored and help while others haven’t.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2024, 6:00pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/32 "2024-09-07T18:00:36Z")
[Proposal to active 2, 3, 4 bps fee-tiers on Base](https://vote.uniswapfoundation.org/proposals/69)
We voted **For** : In line with our prior reasoning, and after confirmation that the code is genuine, we are in support.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [September 10, 2024, 10:37pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/33 "2024-09-10T22:37:00Z")
[UAC Renewal S3
](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xad9fc83135d5e8e8505030aeb659239d99bc07091a4b4d5038fd6c8ea09549fa)
We voted **Renew UAC** : As contributors over the last couple of seasons, and as part of the team drafting the renewal proposal, we believe it was at a level ready for final snapshot review. Thanks to the community for their continued trust in this committee.
[Approved Budgets Rebalancing](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x730241466ef1146d10ffd167f995b327f1ba9d7ad13d7ca9d2a2802052654b3e)
We voted **Approved Rebalance** : Due to budgets being approved in $ terms and the accounting being done in $, we think it makes sense to rebalance a relatively small amount ot ensure our incentives and operations continue as prior planned.
[Uniswap Delegate Race Tiebreaker
](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x8eb2e8135cab63b0ff987dff2bda9b651f86bf6cc90336a9b11b92640e16405b)
We voted **Both (create an extra 16th spot)**: Thanks to @Tane and @Argonaut for sharing their opinions on the forums and community call this week. Knowing our intentions and belief around how a vote shouldn’t be rushed to be submitted, we think the tiebreaker if needed of who’s been a more active community member makes the most sense. However, hearing the ambiguity and reasoning from @Argonaut’s side, we are rather strongly in favor of both teams being part of the program due to how close the outcome was. We’re here to incentivize more teams to participate and this a step in that direction that is logical.
[Uniswap Accountability S3 Renewal and Rebalance](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/70)
We voted **For** : In line with our prior reasoning. We think the outcome of the delegate race tiebreaker is the best option for everyone.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [September 27, 2024, 3:55am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/34 "2024-09-27T03:55:12Z")
[Forse Analytics for Uniswap Revitalization and Growth Program](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/71)
We voted **For** : In line with our snapshot vote. Additionally, with the increased scope and lowered budget, this is a pretty easy yes for us.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [October 3, 2024, 4:49pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/35 "2024-10-03T16:49:04Z")
[Uniswap Accountability Committee S3 Elections
](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x0ced7d4ed383fe37e3905c187fe668382a32090b994cffc257ecb8a035542d64)
We voted _ **Equal votes to everyone** _: Being on the UAC, we think it’s best to effectively abstain on this vote. It really exciting to see all of the new qualified applicants and best of luck to everyone!
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [October 8, 2024, 1:59am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/36 "2024-10-08T01:59:24Z")
[[TEMP CHECK] - Onboarding Package for Lisk
](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x64aca6822b43a7a4eff64613e16091d0cd9d50483cea78e0d959875dbebf6b69)
We voted **For** : We appreciate the approach Lisk took on this one, offering to allocate $250k of LSK and $1m of POL directly to the DAO for the counter $375k of matched incentives. This seems reasonable and in line to prior deployments; we are in favor.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [October 16, 2024, 8:04pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/37 "2024-10-16T20:04:14Z")
[Uniswap Growth Program Trial](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xc95ebeb66aad587d768ed7ead88acacabbdd89bffb1bae8b15ce245a881ffab9)
We voted **In Support** : We’ve experienced the growth the AG team has had at Compound first handedly and think that this is a great opportunity for the DAO to have a more formalized BD process. Additionally, we’ve always wanted to ramp up the MetaGov team’s grant hunting and so this was a great way for us to get involved on a related piece.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [October 21, 2024, 7:03pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/38 "2024-10-21T19:03:35Z")
[[Updated] Forse Analytics for Uniswap Revitalization and Growth Program](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/72)
We voted **For** : Similar to our vote last time, we are in support of these additions even more for the same costs and increased chains.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [October 23, 2024, 4:38pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/39 "2024-10-23T16:38:06Z")
[Uniswap Growth Program Trial](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/73) (On Chain)
We voted **For** : In similar reasoning as our prior snapshot vote, we are looking forward to hopefully working on the UEII piece more in depth.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [October 30, 2024, 11:43pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/40 "2024-10-30T23:43:05Z")
[[TEMP CHECK] - Tally Uniswap Proposal](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xec5b5f6f61b36cee217ac899c4ce7b922b53d126b29aba680a96fe3aca365fa3) (Snapshot)
We voted **For** : As we stated in the forums, we are excited to see this; taking a step back, the increased prevalence and use of Tally is impressive but not at all surprising. It seems like the go to wording used whenever we or anyone we know proposes a vote on Uni. Gasless voting would be nice, and we’re interested in more regarding optimistic governance and the role of a council. Since that isn’t something Uni has done yet, would be interested in seeing how this could play out, especially with some other DAOs seemingly implementing it pretty well.
[Supporting Tally’s Development and Enhancements for Uniswap DAO Governance](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/74) (On Chain)
We voted **For** : Voting in line with our prior snapshot vote. Everything we mentioned above still applies and we look forward to the product that they are able to bring to Uni in the coming days.
---
### Author:  [@PGov](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/PGov)
#### Post date: [December 4, 2024, 10:39pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271/41 "2024-12-04T22:39:23Z")
[[TEMP CHECK] Uniswap DAO Principles](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xcc5e92fac9d5d9c68bb4f2f742e9e6760c75f7c13a44a02aba33c769505fd2c2) (Snapshot)
We voted **For** : Thanks to the team here for hearing our team’s suggestions and comments during the RFC period for this discussion. We think having these principles collectively agreed to in the DAO should hopefully clear up any ambiguous vases in the future and ultimately be a strong signal of alignment with the ecosystem.
[Previous page](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271.md?page=1)
[Next page](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pgov-delegate-platform/22271.md?page=3)