# PEPO Delegate Platform

**URL:** <https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pepo-delegate-platform/24896>\
**Category:** Delegation Pitch\
**Created:** [November 13, 2024, 9:29am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pepo-delegate-platform/24896 "2024-11-13T09:29:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pepo](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/pepo/32/9497_2.png) [@pepo](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/pepo)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2024, 4:20pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pepo-delegate-platform/24896/7 "2024-12-23T16:20:09Z")

</div>

Proposal: [[TEMP CHECK] Metal L2: Bridging TradFi and DeFi Through Uniswap V3](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x1b31cc6ab6b8ceb3ea3ada7684d08debc20d8a3b29fd94363223892264ab937d)

After reviewing the Metal DAO’s proposal and the feedback from other delegates, I am voting **AGAINST** the proposal.

### Value Proposition:

- From Metal:
  - Uniswap deployment on Metal’s L2 (Superchain)
  - 250k MTL for Protocol Owned Liquidity in Uniswap V3
  - 250k MTL for incentives in Uniswap V3

- From Uniswap:
  - $250k for incentives in Uniswap V3
  - $20k for Merkl integration

### Main Concerns:

- Lack of adoption

It’s always great to see opportunities to expand Uniswap’s reach and offer incentives on new, up-and-coming chains. But we also need to stick to the quality and values we want for the Uniswap ecosystem. Metal DAO has made a bold move asking for UNI incentives for their early chain launch. While I respect their enthusiasm to bring us onboard, there seems to be a lack of consideration in requesting incentives equivalent to their current TVL.

I’m open to revisiting a proposal from them in the future, but only if they can show some solid adoption and traction in the market first.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/pepo-delegate-platform/24896)._