# Lowering of the threshold of "4% of UNI supply required to vote ’yes’ to reach quorum" for more inclusion of the community

**URL:** <https://gov.uniswap.org/t/lowering-of-the-threshold-of-4-of-uni-supply-required-to-vote-yes-to-reach-quorum-for-more-inclusion-of-the-community/4652>\
**Category:** Delegation Pitch\
**Created:** [September 20, 2020, 11:18pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/lowering-of-the-threshold-of-4-of-uni-supply-required-to-vote-yes-to-reach-quorum-for-more-inclusion-of-the-community/4652 "2020-09-20T23:18:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dev-bhaskar8](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e95f7d/32.png) [@dev-bhaskar8](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/dev-bhaskar8)\
**Post date:** [September 20, 2020, 11:18pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/lowering-of-the-threshold-of-4-of-uni-supply-required-to-vote-yes-to-reach-quorum-for-more-inclusion-of-the-community/4652/1 "2020-09-20T23:18:12Z")

</div>

Hello community,

I think the 4% criteria makes some sense, so that the whales cannot skew the system by making multiple wallets.

I recommend a more community driven approach to solve this issue by opening delegation option to vote ’yes’ to reach quorum, with an added option of having a threshold of at least 1600 UNI tokens. That is 0.004 % of 4% criteria that is in place.

This will in turn bring more power to the community and would be less discriminatory.

Regards,  
Bhaskar 🙂

Delegate to 0xC87efC9c71C422779F7dbeF14B2Fc4eef94b84fF

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ce73a5/32.png) [@Tim](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Tim)\
**Post date:** [September 20, 2020, 11:19pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/lowering-of-the-threshold-of-4-of-uni-supply-required-to-vote-yes-to-reach-quorum-for-more-inclusion-of-the-community/4652/2 "2020-09-20T23:19:22Z")

</div>

i agree 1600 should be fair

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Noah](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/noah/32/225_2.png) [@Noah](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Noah)\
**Post date:** [September 21, 2020, 4:45pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/lowering-of-the-threshold-of-4-of-uni-supply-required-to-vote-yes-to-reach-quorum-for-more-inclusion-of-the-community/4652/3 "2020-09-21T16:45:09Z")

</div>



---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Noah](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/noah/32/225_2.png) [@Noah](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Noah)\
**Post date:** [September 21, 2020, 4:46pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/lowering-of-the-threshold-of-4-of-uni-supply-required-to-vote-yes-to-reach-quorum-for-more-inclusion-of-the-community/4652/4 "2020-09-21T16:46:05Z")

</div>

while discussion of quorum values is valid, this conversation appears to not be serious/ in good faith, locking