# L2BEAT Delegate Platform **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegation Pitch\ **Created:** [December 13, 2023, 2:13pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/l2beat-delegate-platform/22449 "2023-12-13T14:13:45Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 2
**Author:** ![Sinkas](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/sinkas/32/8189_2.png) [@Sinkas](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Sinkas)\ **Post date:** [April 1, 2024, 4:33pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/l2beat-delegate-platform/22449/2 "2024-04-01T16:33:16Z")
Update for the time period between December 2023 and April 2024: ## Voting ### [Tally] [Deploy Uniswap V3 on Rootstock](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/56?chart=0) - Voted FOR While we didn’t cast our vote in time during the temp-check, we [signaled our support for the proposal in the forum](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/deploy-uniswap-v3-on-rootstock-bitcoin-sidechain/22466/5) and later [voted in the proposal’s favor](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/deploy-uniswap-v3-on-rootstock-bitcoin-sidechain/22466/5) during the on-chain vote. ### [Tally] [Lower Onchain Proposal Threshold](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/55?chart=0) - Voted FOR As with the vote above, we didn’t vote during the temp-check, but [we signaled our support in the forums](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-lower-onchain-proposal-threshold/22429/5). We then [voted for the proposal](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-lower-onchain-proposal-threshold/22429/8) during the on-chain vote. ### [Snapshot] [Uniswap Deployments Accountability Committee Competition](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xe2fa09de5e3ff44b57c40b2fe049f43e47cb8e3b192bd1dc52ef3b42d8b5c363) - Voted for Abdullah Umar We participated in the elections for the members of the UDAC and [threw our full voting power behind @AbdullahUmar](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/uniswap-deployments-accountability-committee-next-steps-the-committee-application-thread/22475/10). ### [Snapshot] Uniswap Revitalization and Growth Following the proposal to create onboarding packages for different chains, we cast our votes for how big the package for each chain should be. There were 10 individual votes on Snapshot. Although we didn’t share a rationale behind each choice, [we did participate in the discussion](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/uniswap-revitalization-and-growth/22616/46) to raise the point that we’d like to see a post-implementation analysis. Following the Snapshot votes, the proposal went to [on-chain vote](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/59?chart=list) where [we voted in its favor](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/uniswap-revitalization-and-growth/22616/66). ### [Snapshot] [Deploy Uniswap v3 on Zora](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x84b5c020421459f753681683cf2489548eea020c4f67bf08ccf05cbcd78caaa7) - Voted FOR As with similar votes in the past, [we voted in favor](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-deploy-uniswap-v3-on-zora/22724/6) of the proposal. ### [Tally] [Deploy Uniswap V2 on all chains with V3](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/58?chart=list) - Voted FOR We have been in favor of this proposal ever since the temp check, so it was natural for us [to vote in favor of the proposal](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/temperature-check-deploy-uniswap-v2-on-all-chains-with-v3/21799/8) during the on-chain vote as well. ### [Snapshot] [Activate Uniswap Protocol Governance](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xad7e3612d11d56b21f0b2274e4ce825163bc1873d0e2ef809a3a98733df992a7) - Voted FOR We [voted in favor of the proposal during temp check](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/temperature-check-activate-uniswap-protocol-governance/22936/73) while also expressing our need to resolve the discussion around the setOwner() function before going to an on-chain vote. ### [Snapshot] [Uniswap V3 Fees: Factory Owner Amendment](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x3d8d2f44677c19f49a5bbe4466e4b50068b1a704861801d95384c898b1cbde54) - Voted AGAINST After following the discussion closely, we [decided to vote against the proposal](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/uniswap-v3-fees-factory-owner-amendment/23187/13) as we believed there was no concrete argument for forcing the amendment other than the need to further discuss the implementation of the ‘Activate Uniswap Protocol Governance’ proposal. ### [Snapshot] [Mobilizing Uniswap’s Treasury](https://snapshot.org/#/uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xd2d3a01ed6e4b0c080073d4510f545a51db224ff6e57babb9454640cc5e1ddfd) - Voted FOR We [voted in favor of the proposal during the temp check](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/mobilizing-the-uniswap-treasury/23397/20) as treasury management is of vital importance and having a dedicated working group for it seems like the way to go. ## L2BEAT’s Uniswap Office Hours We want to remind everyone that every week, we’re hosting Uniswap Office Hours on Google Meets. The office hours will be held **every** **Friday at 3 pm UTC/ 11 am EST** During Office Hours, you will be able to reach L2BEAT’s governance team, which consists of [Kaereste](https://twitter.com/kaereste) (Krzysztof Urbanski) and [Sinkas](https://twitter.com/Sinkas_) (Anastassis Oikonomopoulos), and discuss our activity as delegates. The purpose of the office hours is to gather feedback from the people who have delegated to us, answer any questions in regard to our voting activities and rationale, and collect input on things you’d like us to engage in discussions about. You can [add the L2BEAT Governance Calendar in your Google Calendar](https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0?cid=Y18wNzQ1ODJiMWJkNWE2NTVjOGNkMmQ2YjNhYjliZDQ0NzcxY2U3MDgyYzI2Zjk0MmQ1MzM5ZWUxZDllN2M4YzA0QGdyb3VwLmNhbGVuZGFyLmdvb2dsZS5jb20) to find the respective Google Meets links for every call and to easily keep track of the Office Hours, as well as other important calls and events (e.g. voting deadlines) relevant to Uniswap that L2BEAT governance team will be attending or hosting. --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/l2beat-delegate-platform/22449)._