# \[Governance Proposal\] Uniswap Unleashed: Unichain and Uniswap v4 Liquidity Incentives

**URL:** <https://gov.uniswap.org/t/governance-proposal-uniswap-unleashed-unichain-and-uniswap-v4-liquidity-incentives/25250>\
**Category:** Requests for Comment\
**Created:** [February 14, 2025, 2:58am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/governance-proposal-uniswap-unleashed-unichain-and-uniswap-v4-liquidity-incentives/25250 "2025-02-14T02:58:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 41

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GFXlabs](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/gfxlabs/32/4510_2.png) [@GFXlabs](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/GFXlabs)\
**Post date:** [March 14, 2025, 5:35pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/governance-proposal-uniswap-unleashed-unichain-and-uniswap-v4-liquidity-incentives/25250/41 "2025-03-14T17:35:19Z")

</div>

While we have cast [our vote](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/gfx-labs-delegate-communication-thread/24194/12) on the “Uniswap Unleashed” proposal, we would like to seek clarification on this proposal before casting our vote. If the Uniswap Foundation/Gauntlet can ensure that pools that bypass the protocol fee functionality are excluded from this campaign, then we can flip to being in favor of this proposal.

It’s our current understanding that pools using the “No-Op” hook bypass the DAO’s ability to set protocol fees. We want to ensure that the DAO invests its UNI in places where it can potentially recoup its investment from future protocol fees.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/governance-proposal-uniswap-unleashed-unichain-and-uniswap-v4-liquidity-incentives/25250)._