# "Fee Switch" Design Space & Next Steps

**URL:** <https://gov.uniswap.org/t/fee-switch-design-space-next-steps/17132>\
**Category:** Requests for Comment\
**Created:** [July 19, 2022, 12:41am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/fee-switch-design-space-next-steps/17132 "2022-07-19T00:41:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jcp](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/jcp/32/3143_2.png) [@jcp](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/jcp)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2022, 12:57am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/fee-switch-design-space-next-steps/17132/2 "2022-07-19T00:57:21Z")

</div>

Like the proposal and discussion. I think a major consideration here is whether or not liquidity providers remove liquidity as a result. Given that we don’t know for sure how this type of change would play out, I think using 2 of the largest and most important pools is pretty high risk. Personally, I would prefer to try something like this on a couple of smaller but significant pools to start before going this big, but this discussion is interesting and I’m following along.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/fee-switch-design-space-next-steps/17132)._