# Continue the Uniswap V3 deployment on Gnosis Chain with different bridge provider

**URL:** <https://gov.uniswap.org/t/continue-the-uniswap-v3-deployment-on-gnosis-chain-with-different-bridge-provider/20724>\
**Category:** Requests for Comment\
**Created:** [March 13, 2023, 11:41am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/continue-the-uniswap-v3-deployment-on-gnosis-chain-with-different-bridge-provider/20724 "2023-03-13T11:41:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![owl](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/owl/32/7127_2.png) [@owl](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/owl)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 5:07pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/continue-the-uniswap-v3-deployment-on-gnosis-chain-with-different-bridge-provider/20724/3 "2023-03-13T17:07:08Z")

</div>

Thanks @MattOnChain !  
We are completely aligned with the research process and we have submitted a multiple provider approach ourselves ([link to post](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/cross-chain-bridge-assessment-process/20148/25)).  
As mentioned above, we plan to reassess the approach the moment we get feedback from the committee.

However, we believe that currently is vital to proceed and complete a plan that was initiated almost a year ago.

Additionally, votes for Avalanche and Kava are also on-going with promising support.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/continue-the-uniswap-v3-deployment-on-gnosis-chain-with-different-bridge-provider/20724)._