# Consensus Check: Uniswap Funds Community-Enabled Analytics via Yield-Generating Investment Strategies

**URL:** https://gov.uniswap.org/t/consensus-check-uniswap-funds-community-enabled-analytics-via-yield-generating-investment-strategies/13220
**Category:** Requests for Comment
**Created:** [July 4, 2021, 11:10pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/consensus-check-uniswap-funds-community-enabled-analytics-via-yield-generating-investment-strategies/13220 "2021-07-04T23:10:41Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![uniyj](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/uniyj/32/5438_2.png) [@uniyj](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/uniyj)
#### Post date: [August 17, 2021, 10:15am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/consensus-check-uniswap-funds-community-enabled-analytics-via-yield-generating-investment-strategies/13220/7 "2021-08-17T10:15:37Z")

</div>

Late to this. Apologies if this has been raised and discussed elsewhere.

What’s the contingency plan if the actual yield is not as high as the targeted yield (30%?!) needed to fund the estimated budget? Would the “no negative net UNI” ethos always take precedence, and if so, how then would the budget shortfall (per estimated budget necessary) be funded?

Thanks.

yj

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/consensus-check-uniswap-funds-community-enabled-analytics-via-yield-generating-investment-strategies/13220)._