# Avantgarde Finance Delegate Platform **URL:** \ **Category:** Delegation Pitch\ **Created:** [September 17, 2024, 7:22am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/avantgarde-finance-delegate-platform/24591 "2024-09-17T07:22:33Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 21
**Author:** ![Avantgarde](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/avantgarde/32/8918_2.png) [@Avantgarde](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Avantgarde)\ **Post date:** [May 7, 2025, 3:05pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/avantgarde-finance-delegate-platform/24591/21 "2025-05-07T15:05:22Z")
### [[TEMP CHECK] Scaling V4 and Supporting Unichain](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x58f16ed9e140551bb80d265ea9b958e96c542a7d7afc081610f72506a4f7cb05) We voted **for** this temp check with a few caveats ahead of the onchain vote, which we expressed in the proposal thread: > [@Scaling V4 and Supporting Unichain](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/scaling-v4-and-supporting-unichain/25484/35): > > Thanks to GFX Labs for putting this proposal forward. We really appreciate the work your team has already done for Uniswap in successfully expanding our reach across many chains, and believe Oku has proven to be a valuable piece of infrastructure for the ecosystem. > > We’re generally supportive of what this proposal aims to achieve. Getting Uniswap V4 scaled up quickly and making sure there are good tools available from the get-go is important for its success and for keeping Uniswap at the forefront. Likewise, we do see the benefits of allowing GFX lead V4 rollouts from a streamlining perspective, and the requested funding appears fair for the amount of work involved. > > We do agree that it would be nice to see some additional activity data beyond mere deployments, and also think other delegates have raised valid points with regards to “excessive” profiteering. We very much appreciate the added context from @AbdullahUmar which does provide reassurances. For now, we’ll support this proposal in the temp check but want to emphasise that the details around these concerns need to be hashed out and necessary assurances included in writing to avoid having to rely on “trust me bro” before we can fully support this proposal at the onchain vote. ### [UAC Renewal S4](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/87) We voted **for** this proposal in line with our Snapshot vote, see rationale [here](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/avantgarde-finance-delegate-platform/24591/20). ### [Approved Budgets Rebalancing (S4)](https://www.tally.xyz/gov/uniswap/proposal/86) We voted **for** this proposal in line with our Snapshot vote, see rationale [here](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/avantgarde-finance-delegate-platform/24591/20). ### [Four Chains for Analytics Hub for Uniswap’s Revitalization and Growth Program](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0xd0e154ab11dfeed1fb652c4a4db011937ffa7dd3333847936c09a668b5e5e804) & [[Temp Check] Analytics Hub for Uniswap’s Revitalization and Growth Program](https://snapshot.box/#/s:uniswapgovernance.eth/proposal/0x675c9697cc6c8d1cab27e1cffab3fdc7740b3e978eb37d8b6dcce76d1726670f) We choose to **abstain** on this proposal for the reasons outlined below. We very much appreciate the work of StableLab and their continued contributions to the DAO, and are as a whole supportive of these types of activities to inform better decision-making. A few question marks to be resolved before we can fully support this onchain. > [@\[RFC\] Analytics Hub for Uniswap's Revitalization and Growth Program](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/rfc-analytics-hub-for-uniswaps-revitalization-and-growth-program/25493/7): > > Thank you @Doo_StableLab, we very much appreciate StableLab’s continued engagement and work delivered in the initial proposal and terminal. Admittedly, we have not dug deep into the numbers but recognise this has provided valuable initial insights into the incentive programs and their effectiveness. Extending this analysis to additional chains now that we have the terminal up and running makes sense to provide a broader dataset across different chain environments and to keep refining future strategies to optimise the use of DAO resources. > > However, we do have a couple of points that we’d like further clarity on before we are comfortable backing the proposal fully onchain. For now, we’ll abstain on the temp check but remain open to support a revised proposal that addresses these points with greater clarity. > > - Ideally, we think the DAO should first assess the _utility_ of the initial output _before_ funding more of the same. To what extent has the DAO used the terminal, i.e. have the recommendations started informing discussions or decisions? > - We’ve seen differing views on the value of analysing chains with lower DeFi TVL. Our perspective is that this depends heavily on the DAO’s specific strategic objectives – whether the goal is to maximise immediate TVL on large chains or understanding performance across a spectrum of ecosystem “maturities” and potential growth areas. Any thoughts here? > > Thank you! --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/avantgarde-finance-delegate-platform/24591)._