All votes for October.
On-chain
Vote: Abstain. While the updated proposal is improved, it still doesn’t address my core issue, so unfortunately I cannot support it. Additionally, while I don’t have strong enough objections to vote against, I would prefer that this analysis was done by a neutral third party rather than an entity strongly tied to the DAO itself - it’s a drawback not a benefit in my view, because a priori it makes getting objective answer less likely.
Vote: For. Agree on the point that “We’re leaving incentives on the table”. Additionally, getting more engaged with the chains can be a good way how get the Uniswap protocol in front of their users and increase the core metrics of the protocol. While getting these incentives is not a priority for Uniswap in my view, the cost/benefit ratio could be quite good. If not, it’s just a 6 month trial, not an extensive commitment from the DAO.
Snapshot
-
Uniswap Growth Program Trial
Vote: In Support. Same rationale as for the on-chain vote. -
[TEMP CHECK] - Onboarding Package for Lisk
Vote: For. In general I support deployments on L2s. While the current TVL is tiny, Lisk has been around for a long time and is likely to deliver a solid L2 once everything is ready. Matching incentives and POL is appreciated, and deserve UNI commitment from the DAO.
Vote: Alicecorsini, _JoJo, Doo, Sov, Marian in equal weight. The vote was based on reading candidate profiles and, for some of them, on previous familiarity with their work.