# Application For Retroactive Proxy Contract Airdrop \[For Projects / Apps\] **URL:** \ **Category:** Requests for Comment\ **Created:** [September 19, 2020, 12:44am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221 "2020-09-19T00:44:57Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 3
**Author:** ![yanghelong1](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/yanghelong1/32/2643_2.png) [@yanghelong1](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/yanghelong1)\ **Post date:** [September 21, 2020, 5:04am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/54 "2020-09-21T05:04:12Z")
> **[Ethereum Transaction Hash (Txhash) Details | Etherscan](https://cn.etherscan.com/tx/0xbc7f2ec6a6502a092fbd0874ae919bd0f4dcd0660f1c3c052bb2855a49eaf521?locale=zh-CN&utm_source=imtoken)** > > Ethereum (ETH) detailed transaction info for txhash 0xbc7f2ec6a6502a092fbd0874ae919bd0f4dcd0660f1c3c052bb2855a49eaf521. The transaction status, block confirmation, gas fee, Ether (ETH), and token transfer are shown. Transaction Hash: 0xbc7f2ec6a6502a092fbd0874ae919bd0f4dcd0660f1c3c052bb2855a49eaf521 The Address 0xBf592177E1918ABEC7c9D435157b76f52601DdB4 page allows users to view the source code, transactions, balances, and analytics for the contract address. Users can also interact and make transactions to the contract directly on… ---
**Author:** ![wazza](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/35a633/32.png) [@wazza](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/wazza)\ **Post date:** [September 21, 2020, 5:05am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/55 "2020-09-21T05:05:30Z")
Absolutely NOT. Will be voting no and encouraging all others UNISWAP members to vote no as well. You try to bypass Uniswap and now you want UNI tokens? Funny. Not a chance. ---
**Author:** ![nadav\_dharma](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/e79b87/32.png) [@nadav\_dharma](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/nadav_dharma)\ **Post date:** [September 21, 2020, 5:30am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/57 "2020-09-21T05:30:14Z")
# Submission Instructions For Omitted User Addresses Hey everyone! Thank you to all the projects who are participating in the proposal. Here’s what I need moving forward to get this proposal to the finish line. I mentioned this previously, but I want to underscore it again: **the earliest date users will get their UNI distributed to them is October 17th.** As such, there is a _much_ higher premium on rigor than on speed in getting this proposal submitted — though the pulse of the community seems to be largely favorable on this proposal, there are legitimate threads of concern & suspicion that are best addressed through a thoroughly transparent process. **By the end of this week, we will be submitting a proposal to the governance module that will grant ERC20 `approval` to a merkle drop contract we deploy committing to a set of addresses for allocation.** That set of addresses will be determined through the process described below. If the number of addresses committed to is greater than 5% of the original allocation, we will have a discussion around whether and how we wish to minimize the amount of UNI that will ultimately be pulled from the community treasury (e.g. by forcing users to preemptively `claim` their allocation before October 17th on the merkle drop contract). Otherwise, we will proceed with allocating UNI to the addresses aligned on in a manner similar to the initial allocation. ## List of projects currently included: - **Dharma** - **DeFi Saver** - **Paraswap (should encompass Monolith users)** - **Nuo** - **0x API** - **MyEtherWallet** - **Totle** - **Eidoo** - **1inch.exchange** (clarification requested here @deacix) - **Furucombo** - **Kyber** ## Projects Who Wish To Be Included Need To Do This 👇🏼 Within the next 48 hours… - Provide a list of affected addresses from your userbase. Please post a link that resolves to a JSON file containing the addresses — we will be programmatically validating them against the list of contract addresses that have ever been in the call-chain of a Uniswap transaction, and publishing code that allows the community to cross-reference the submitted addresses with those involved in Uniswap transactions. - **Please be sure to omit addresses from your submission that were already in the initial retroactive airdrop — some of the larger figures quoted for “estimated # of addresses” in the applications likely overlap with the initial Uniswap allocation heavily, given that most of the projects listed were primarily interacted with through a generic web3 wallet like Metamask.** - Please provide a basic code snippet on Github or Dune Analytics query that demonstrates how you pulled the list of excluded addresses. We will then compile all of the above into a formalized governance proposal to the broader community. The goal is to have a list of addresses where: - It’s programatically clear that they were omitted from the original allocation due to the unintentional proxy contract ommission - It’s programatically clear that they were not included in the original allocation - The amount of UNI that would need to be allocated to this user segment would be, ideally, less than 5% of the original allocation, and, at worst, 10% of the original allocation. ---
**Author:** ![moody](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/moody/32/5266_2.png) [@moody](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/moody)\ **Post date:** [September 21, 2020, 5:41am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/58 "2020-09-21T05:41:25Z")
Offering some technical advice: you may benefit from forking the [retroactive query repository](https://github.com/Uniswap/retroactive-query) and requesting each project write a query that identifies all users of their protocol and send a pull request. Then in the final query, union all these project queries and exclude the users contained in the original users query. I would personally prefer to see all the queries written in this way, merkle tree generated and all immutable contracts deployed (including an immutable merkle root), before submission of any governance proposals. ---
**Author:** ![deacix](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/deacix/32/329_2.png) [@deacix](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/deacix)\ **Post date:** [September 21, 2020, 7:49am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/60 "2020-09-21T07:49:38Z")
Hey! Half of them are our main aggregation smart contracts and the half is on chain aggregation contracts 1split. We deployed multiple versions over time. ---
**Author:** ![ramvi](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/ramvi/32/949_2.png) [@ramvi](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/ramvi)\ **Post date:** [September 21, 2020, 9:05am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/61 "2020-09-21T09:05:55Z")
## What is the name of your project? Rebalance.to ## Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st [https://app.rebalance.to/](https://app.rebalance.to/) ## Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed > **[Contract Address 0x1c3031e02e9a0ec237f5bd674eaaa5e56a2ae174 | Etherscan](https://etherscan.io/address/0x1c3031e02e9a0ec237f5bd674eaaa5e56a2ae174)** > > The Contract Address 0x1c3031e02e9a0ec237f5bd674eaaa5e56a2ae174 page allows users to view the source code, transactions, balances, and analytics for the contract address. Users can also interact and make transactions to the contract directly on... ## How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root. about 7 ---
**Author:** ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/uploads/uniswap1/original/2X/9/90cfa6277b6a2a2dd92cf5fe636094955bbdadde.png) [@system](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/system)\ **Post date:** [September 21, 2020, 11:34am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/63 "2020-09-21T11:34:12Z")
Closed on September 21, 2020, 11:34am UTC This topic is temporarily closed for at least 4 hours due to a large number of community flags. ---
**Author:** ![system](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/uploads/uniswap1/original/2X/9/90cfa6277b6a2a2dd92cf5fe636094955bbdadde.png) [@system](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/system)\ **Post date:** [September 21, 2020, 3:34pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/65 "2020-09-21T15:34:18Z")
Opened on September 21, 2020, 3:34pm UTC This topic was automatically opened after 4 hours. ---
**Author:** ![brendan\_dharma](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e274bd/32.png) [@brendan\_dharma](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/brendan_dharma)\ **Post date:** [September 21, 2020, 4:15pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/66 "2020-09-21T16:15:10Z")
Itamar, since Argent’s trades are executed by Kyber, and Kyber has submitted a separate application for inclusion, I believe Argent’s users would be a sub-set of Kyber’s. Could you confirm if that’s correct? ---
**Author:** ![nedodn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/f1d935/32.png) [@nedodn](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/nedodn)\ **Post date:** [September 21, 2020, 4:30pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/67 "2020-09-21T16:30:07Z")
## What is the name of your project? DEX.AG ## Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st > ## Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed > **[Contract Address 0x745daa146934b27e3f0b6bff1a6e36b9b90fb131 | Etherscan](https://etherscan.io/address/0x745daa146934b27e3f0b6bff1a6e36b9b90fb131)** > > The Contract Address 0x745daa146934b27e3f0b6bff1a6e36b9b90fb131 page allows users to view the source code, transactions, balances, and analytics for the contract address. Users can also interact and make transactions to the contract directly on... ## How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root. ~2000-3000 ---
**Author:** ![nedodn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/f1d935/32.png) [@nedodn](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/nedodn)\ **Post date:** [September 21, 2020, 4:30pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/68 "2020-09-21T16:30:42Z")
Two more contract links that weren’t able to be posted due to the two link limit: > **[Contract Address 0x932348DF588923bA3F1Fd50593B22C4e2A287919 | Etherscan](https://etherscan.io/address/0x932348DF588923bA3F1Fd50593B22C4e2A287919)** > > The Contract Address 0x932348DF588923bA3F1Fd50593B22C4e2A287919 page allows users to view the source code, transactions, balances, and analytics for the contract address. Users can also interact and make transactions to the contract directly on... > **[Contract Address 0xa540fb50288cc31639305b1675c70763c334953b | Etherscan](https://etherscan.io/address/0xa540fb50288cc31639305b1675c70763c334953b)** > > The Contract Address 0xa540fb50288cc31639305b1675c70763c334953b page allows users to view the source code, transactions, balances, and analytics for the contract address. Users can also interact and make transactions to the contract directly on... ---
**Author:** ![itamar\_argent.xyz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/itamar_argent.xyz/32/691_2.png) [@itamar\_argent.xyz](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/itamar_argent.xyz)\ **Post date:** [September 21, 2020, 4:50pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/69 "2020-09-21T16:50:10Z")
I’ve contacted Kyber to confirm as they might have included our module as a single user. I’ll update as soon as we have confirmation. ---
**Author:** ![Andrew-Opyn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/919ad9/32.png) [@Andrew-Opyn](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Andrew-Opyn)\ **Post date:** [September 21, 2020, 7:27pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/70 "2020-09-21T19:27:00Z")
Hi everyone, Andrew from Opyn here. Realize we’re a bit behind the deadline and just realized this proposal was active! Would love to still participate if possible. I’m unable post with links, so will leave them as text for now. ## What is the name of your project? Opyn ## Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st `https://medium.com/opyn/providing-insurance-on-opyn-b370e67a709a` ## Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed `https://etherscan.io/address/0x5778f2824a114f6115dc74d432685d3336216017` `https://etherscan.io/address/0x39246c4f3f6592c974ebc44f80ba6dc69b817c71` ## How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root. ~600 Thanks! ---
**Author:** ![deacix](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/deacix/32/329_2.png) [@deacix](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/deacix)\ **Post date:** [September 21, 2020, 8:32pm UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/71 "2020-09-21T20:32:25Z")
0x11111254369792b2ca5d084ab5eea397ca8fa48b -\> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap 0x111111254b08ceeee8ad6ca827de9952d2a46781 -\> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x111112549cfedf7822eb11fbd8fd485d8a10f93f -\> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x0000000f8eF4be2B7AeD6724e893c1b674B9682D -\> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x000005eDbbc1f258302aDd96B5E20D3442E5DD89 -\> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x0000000053D411bEcDb4A82D8603eDC6d8B8b3Bc -\> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x0000000006ADBd7c01Bc0738cDBFc3932600Ad63 -\> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0xE4C577bdEc9cE0F6c54f2f82AED5b1913B71AE2f -\> 1inch aggregation proxy contract which interacts with Uniswap (old one) 0x50fda034c0ce7a8f7efdaebda7aa7ca21cc1267e -\> 1split on-chain aggregator implementation 0x0a236b41add0073df05eac5fc8505ad745c7859d -\> 1split on-chain aggregator implementation 0x2ad672fda8a042c4c78c411bf9d4f1b320aa915a -\> 1split on-chain aggregator implementation 0xc586bef4a0992c495cf22e1aeee4e446cecdee0e -\> 1split on-chain aggregator implementation 0xdff2aa5689fcbc7f479d8c84ac857563798436dd -\> 1split on-chain aggregator implementation ---
**Author:** ![easyswaptrade](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/easyswaptrade/32/1291_2.png) [@easyswaptrade](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/easyswaptrade)\ **Post date:** [September 22, 2020, 8:34am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/72 "2020-09-22T08:34:35Z")
Hi, Please find below the details of our situation. It’s a bit different than yours. In our case we are a project selling tokens on Uniswap and we locked Liquidity tokens on a Liquidity vault to prevent RUG PULL. We are EasySwap, please see the answers on the template below. > [@nadav\_dharma](#): > > ## What is the name of your project? > > EasySwap > > ## Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st > > We have provided liquidity of our coin to Uniswap on this transaction: > /token/0xa0471cdd5c0dc2614535fd7505b17a651a8f0dab?a=0x8c0e876f1da58140695673d07ff42d4786207d1b > > ## Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed > > On our case we have created a Liquidity Vault to prevent RUG PULLING, giving therefore trustworthy to our product and increasing trading volume on Uniswap. > > This is the contract > /address/0x376b512ccd0704ccc4153870918c6dca2c0ee1c5 > > And this is the transaction in which the Liquidity was transferred to the liquidity vault > > /tx/0xfd6dac3b44406c6cc5d2a1ba2aa70d60071053ba5d322deb4b29fe9048b84b5d > > ## How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root. > > We have a small base of roughly 150 holders who were promissed a participation on the profits by liquidity pool > > # Please submit your applications within the next 48 hours — we will attempt to approve / request clarification in an expedient manner over the weekend. No need to over-invest in these applications — the burden of proof is directly proportional to the scale of users affected. > > Sorry that I only saw this post now but I hope it’s still in time for processing the request. > Kind Regards, > EasySwap CEO ---
**Author:** ![bannplayer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/b4bc9f/32.png) [@bannplayer](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/bannplayer)\ **Post date:** [September 22, 2020, 9:05am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/73 "2020-09-22T09:05:17Z")
## What is the name of your project? Growdrop ## Please provide a link that demonstrates your project hosted an active interface to Uniswap prior to September 1st `https://medium.com/growfi/tagged/growdrop` ## Please provide a link on Etherscan to the proxy contract or contracts through which your users’ actions on Uniswap were routed `https://etherscan.io/address/0x98117E9D8AbCFF8c67B7A848B87B044f8A31D3dF` `https://etherscan.io/address/0x38772B4Ff35d679EcD56862418CA4bb4e1918Ece` ## How many of your users do you estimate were excluded from the initial airdrop as a result? Please be sure to exclude from this estimate addresses that are already in the initial airdrop merkle root. ~10 # Please submit your applications within the next 48 hours — we will attempt to approve / request clarification in an expedient manner over the weekend. No need to over-invest in these applications — the burden of proof is directly proportional to the scale of users affected. Sorry for late request. ---
**Author:** ![Adalbertojunior](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@Adalbertojunior](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Adalbertojunior)\ **Post date:** [September 22, 2020, 9:43am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/74 "2020-09-22T09:43:26Z")
Nome do projeto Kyber 0x0d1F5c8309e73eEB43d76aA5Ac40c286CcF5a91B ---
**Author:** ![Adalbertojunior](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@Adalbertojunior](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Adalbertojunior)\ **Post date:** [September 22, 2020, 9:45am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/75 "2020-09-22T09:45:44Z")
Estou perdido. Alguém me ajuda? ---
**Author:** ![Adalbertojunior](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@Adalbertojunior](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Adalbertojunior)\ **Post date:** [September 22, 2020, 10:01am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/76 "2020-09-22T10:01:01Z")
Nome do projeto: kyber { “Txhash”: “0x7c796f5ff9288f546004ee6cc69e2655b9991614510bc975044e3a9cec036a56”, “Blockno”: 10710797, “UnixTimestamp”: 1598109324, “DateTime”: “2020-08-22 15:15:24”, “From”: “0x0681d8db095565fe8a346fa0277bffde9c0edbbf”, “To”: “0x85a95921baa094cd17179c7b87851eb5cb701dcb”, “ContractAddress”: “”, “Value\_IN(ETH)”: 0.72615, “Value\_OUT(ETH)”: 0, “CurrentValue @ $346.6/Eth”: 251.68359, “TxnFee(ETH)”: 0.002352, “TxnFee(USD)”: 0.8152032, “Historical $Price/Eth”: 395.46, “Status”: “”, “ErrCode”: “” }, { “Txhash”: “0x159c10f60b8f2778922d94ceda76417f011562cb1e7abf7b74dfc50e42da3a87”, “Blockno”: 10725670, “UnixTimestamp”: 1598306026, “DateTime”: “2020-08-24 21:53:46”, “From”: “0x85a95921baa094cd17179c7b87851eb5cb701dcb”, “To”: “0x9aab3f75489902f3a48495025729a0af77d4b11e”, “ContractAddress”: “”, “Value\_IN(ETH)”: 0, “Value\_OUT(ETH)”: 0.5436125, “CurrentValue @ $346.6/Eth”: 188.4160925, “TxnFee(ETH)”: 0.035779916, “TxnFee(USD)”: 12.4013188856, “Historical $Price/Eth”: 408.03, “Status”: “”, “ErrCode”: “” }, { “Txhash”: “0x23e82823da716b4162495b566ccf1725586ceeec6146433d26339538703448dc”, “Blockno”: 10742596, “UnixTimestamp”: 1598531401, “DateTime”: “2020-08-27 12:30:01”, “From”: “0x85a95921baa094cd17179c7b87851eb5cb701dcb”, “To”: “0xcab5174d29433d631f70f462709ef2b20e7aa916”, “ContractAddress”: “”, “Value\_IN(ETH)”: 0, “Value\_OUT(ETH)”: 0.144615584, “CurrentValue @ $346.6/Eth”: 50.1237614144, “TxnFee(ETH)”: 0.002142, “TxnFee(USD)”: 0.7424172, “Historical $Price/Eth”: 383.18, “Status”: “”, “ErrCode”: “” } ] ---
**Author:** ![Anyhowclick](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/gov.uniswap.org/anyhowclick/32/1040_2.png) [@Anyhowclick](https://gov.uniswap.org/u/Anyhowclick)\ **Post date:** [September 22, 2020, 10:27am UTC](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221/77 "2020-09-22T10:27:10Z")
I’ve verified that a couple of addresses you’ve above will be included in our list. On another note, we have 30,250 addresses in total, after filtering claimed addresses. The reason why it increased from the initial amount in my previous post is because I wrote a [Dune Analytics](https://explore.duneanalytics.com/queries/10167) query to fetch the addresses, which lacked addresses trading through our new Kyber proxy contract (0x9aab3f75489902f3a48495025729a0af77d4b11e). We have since wrote a [custom script](https://gist.github.com/ayobuenavista/0bf4d164320c1261b1ae7879821c3a08) to supplement the dune analytics query, fetching the data using a local node. I believe that a substantial no. of addresses will overlap with some projects as well (Eg. 1inch, Argent etc.) since they have integrated us for the token swaps. [Previous page](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221.md?page=2) [Next page](https://gov.uniswap.org/t/application-for-retroactive-proxy-contract-airdrop-for-projects-apps/3221.md?page=4)