404 DAO Delegate Platform

Delegation Pitch
7

Rationale for Votes Occurring in October

Snapshot

  1. Uniswap Accountability Committee S3 Elections
  • Proposal: Link
  • Vote: 50/50 Jojo and Alice Corsini
  • Rationale: We voted to elect Jojo and Alice Corsini as the two new committee members. Alice brings extensive experience in Uniswap governance, serving as a delegate with Karpatkey and a member of the Uniswap Treasury Working Group. While Jojo is newer to the Uniswap DAO, he brings valuable expertise in DeFi and incentives through his work at Jones DAO and as an Arbitrum LTIPP advisor. We are confident in their abilities to be strong additions to the Uniswap Accountability Committee.
  1. Onboarding Package for Lisk
  • Proposal: Link
  • Vote: AGAINST
  • Rationale: We voted AGAINST the Onboarding Package for Lisk, primarily due to two concerns. First, Lisk’s TVL consists entirely of its own token, and the proposed incentives would nearly exceed this TVL. Second, the chain has minimal usage, despite being launched for some time, and we are unconvinced that this will change.
  1. Uniswap Growth Program Trial
  • Proposal: Link
  • Vote: IN SUPPORT
  • Rationale: We voted IN SUPPORT of the Uniswap Growth Program Trial. Business Development and Marketing are currently underserved areas in Uniswap DAO, and AlphaGrowth brings extensive growth marketing and outbound business development experience from DAOs such as Compound. With that said, we echo concerns raised on the forum about the potential compliance risks associated with marketing incentives. We’re pleased to see that the AlphaGrowth team has responded and committed to implementing a formal legal review process for all marketing efforts.

Tally

  1. Forse Analytics for Uniswap Revitalization and Growth Program
  • Proposal: Link
  • Vote: FOR
  • Rationale: We voted FOR this proposal during the temp check phase and our previously stated rationale has not changed.
  1. Uniswap Growth Program Trial
  • Proposal: Link
  • Vote: FOR
  • Rationale: We voted IN SUPPORT of this proposal during the temp check phase and our previously stated rationale has not changed.